Kohda, Masanori. “The Evolutionary Origin of Self-Awareness in Vertebrates: The “Self-Awareness Homology Hypothesis”.” Philosophia (2025): 1-8. [Link]1/1
Kohda, Masanori, Shumpei Sogawa, and Will Sowersby. “The ability of teleost fishes to recognize individual faces suggests an early evolutionary origin in vertebrates.” Frontiers in Psychology 15 (2024): 1497386.[Link]1/2
Dunkley, Katie, et al. “Individual identification of bony fishes using unique body markings: Implications and applications.” Journal of Fish Biology (2025).[Link]1/2
Jordan, Alex, et al. “Societies of the shell-dwelling cichlid Neolamprologus multifasciatus.” Animal Behaviour 231 (2026): 123407.[Link]1/3
Ozkan, Kerstin, Jordan M. Langley, and Clinton D. Francis. “Experimental exposure of indirect light at night alters western bluebird parent activity and nestling development.” Animal Behaviour 231 (2026): 123419.[Link]1/4
Ramellini, Samuele, et al. “Non‐breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs.” Biological Reviews 100.6 (2025): 2726-2737.[Link]1/7
Madhavan, Malavika, and Pavel Linhart. “Vocal individuality in owls: a taxon-wide review in the context of Tinbergen’s four questions.” Journal of Ornithology 166.2 (2025): 307-319.[Link]1/8
Werba, Jo A., et al. “Stranger danger: A meta-analysis of the dear enemy hypothesis.” Behavioural Processes 194 (2022): 104542.[Link]1/8
Tomihara, Soma, et al. “Sexual receptivity increases in synchrony with the ovulatory cycle in female medaka.” Journal of Neuroendocrinology 38.1 (2026): e70119.[Link]1/9
Zhu, Boshan, et al. “When neighbors become family: the dear-enemy effect of swimming crab and the verification of the formation hypothesis.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 78.4 (2024): 49.[Link]1/10
Maya Lastra, Natalia, et al. ““Dear enemies”,“nasty neighbors”, and the strength in numbers: Exploring the behavioral and hormonal responses of mantled howler monkey males to simulated intruder loud calls.” American Journal of Primatology 87.4 (2025): e70032.[Link]1/10
Kudo, Haruka, and Chiaki I. Yasuda. “Aggression, but not familiar recognition, occurs during cohabitation in females of a hermit crab.” Ethology 131.11 (2025): 205-211.[Link]1/10
Kohda, Masanori, et al. “Facial recognition in a group-living cichlid fish.” PLoS One 10.11 (2015): e0142552.[Link]1/10
Satoh, Shun, Hirokazu Tanaka, and Masanori Kohda. “Facial recognition in a discus fish (Cichlidae): experimental approach using digital models.” PloS one 11.5 (2016): e0154543.[Link]1/10
Wasserman, Edward A. “Face facts: Even nonhuman animals discriminate human faces.” Learning & behavior 44.4 (2016): 307-308.[Link]1/11
Hotta, Takashi, et al. “Face recognition in the Tanganyikan cichlid Julidochromis transcriptus.” Animal Behaviour 127 (2017): 1-5.[Link]1/11
Hotta, Takashi, et al. “Fish focus primarily on the faces of other fish.” Scientific reports 9.1 (2019): 8377.[Link]1/11
Kawasaka, Kento, Takashi Hotta, and Masanori Kohda. “Does a cichlid fish process face holistically? Evidence of the face inversion effect.” Animal Cognition 22.2 (2019): 153-162.[Link]1/11
Sogawa, Shumpei, et al. “Male guppies recognize familiar conspecific males by their face.” Zoological science 40.2 (2023): 168-174.[Link]1/11
Three-spined sticklebacks recognize familiar individuals by facial recognition[Link]1/11
Kobayashi, Taiga, et al. “Cleaner fish with mirror self-recognition capacity precisely realize their body size based on their mental image.” Scientific Reports 14.1 (2024): 20202.[Link]1/11
Coss, Richard G., and Carol Lee Tyler. “African jewel fish (Hemichromis bimaculatus) distinguish individual faces based on their unique iridophore patterns.” Animal Cognition 26.4 (2023): 1411-1421.[Link]1/11
Wang, Mu-Yun, and Hideaki Takeuchi. “Individual recognition and the ‘face inversion effect’in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes).” Elife 6 (2017): e24728.[Link]1/11
Kang, Ik Joon, et al. “Sound production in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) and its alteration by exposure to aldicarb and copper sulfate.” Chemosphere 181 (2017): 530-535.[Link]1/12
Zhuo, Mengcheng, et al. “Time-series variation in the locomotor behavior and vocal traits of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) acutely exposed to organophosphorus pesticide chlorpyrifos.” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 283 (2024): 109954.[Link]1/12
Greenhalgh, Jack A., et al. “The role of freshwater bioacoustics in ecological research.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 7.3 (2020): e1416.[Link]1/13
Muñoz-Duque, Sebastián, et al. “Bioacoustic characterization of mating calls of a freshwater fish (Prochilodus magdalenae) for passive acoustic monitoring.” Biota colombiana 22.1 (2021): 108-121.[Link]1/13
Cohen, Rebecca, et al. “Sounds of Atlantic sturgeon spawning: first description and opportunities for riverine endangered species conservation with passive acoustic monitoring.” Endangered Species Research 58 (2025): 1-14.[Link]1/13
Parsons, Miles JG, et al. “Sounding the call for a global library of underwater biological sounds.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10 (2022): 810156.[Link]1/13
Nakahata, Ryohei, and Hideaki Takeuchi. “Social familiarity shapes collective decision-making in response to looming stimuli in Medaka fish.” Scientific Reports 15.1 (2025): 43650.[Link]1/13
Robinson, Trent. “Recognition of Individual Conspecifics: Evidence From a 3‐Chambered Test With Ghost Crab (Ocypode quadrata).” Ethology (2025).[Link]1/14
Sogabe, Atsushi. “Partner recognition in a perennially monogamous pipefish, Corythoichthys haematopterus.” Journal of Ethology 29.1 (2011): 191-196.[Link]1/15
Siebeck, Ulrike E., et al. “A species of reef fish that uses ultraviolet patterns for covert face recognition.” Current Biology 20.5 (2010): 407-410.[Link]1/15
Yorzinski, Jessica L. “The cognitive basis of individual recognition.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 16 (2017): 53-57.[Link]1/15
von Schmalensee, Menja, et al. “Frenemies in Fur: neighbour–stranger discrimination and the ‘dear enemy’effect in mammals, and how it relates to sociality.” Animal Behaviour (2025): 123162.[Link]1/18
Parsons, Miles JG, et al. “Sounding the call for a global library of underwater biological sounds.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10 (2022): 810156.[Link]1/19
Cohen, Rebecca, et al. “Sounds of Atlantic sturgeon spawning: first description and opportunities for riverine endangered species conservation with passive acoustic monitoring.” Endangered Species Research 58 (2025): 1-14.[Link]1/19
Amorim, M. Clara P., Raquel O. Vasconcelos, and Paulo J. Fonseca. “Fish sounds and mate choice.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 1-33.[Link]1/20
Bass, Andrew H., Boris P. Chagnaud, and Ni Y. Feng. “Comparative neurobiology of sound production in fishes.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 35-75.[Link]1/20
Fine, Michael L., and Eric Parmentier. “Mechanisms of fish sound production.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 77-126.[Link]1/20
Ladich, Friedrich. “Ontogenetic development of sound communication in fishes.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 127-148.[Link]1/20
Ladich, Friedrich. “Acoustic signalling in female fish.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 149-173.[Link]1/20
Lugli, Marco. “Habitat acoustics and the low-frequency communication of shallow water fishes.” Sound Communication in Fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 175-206.[Link]1/20
Maruska, Karen P., and Joseph A. Sisneros. “Sex steroid-dependent modulation of acoustic communication systems in fishes.” Sound communication in fishes. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2015. 207-233. [Link]1/20
Kang, Ik Joon, et al. “Sound production in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) and its alteration by exposure to aldicarb and copper sulfate.” Chemosphere 181 (2017): 530-535. [Link]1/21
Zhuo, Mengcheng, et al. “Time-series variation in the locomotor behavior and vocal traits of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) acutely exposed to organophosphorus pesticide chlorpyrifos.” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 283 (2024): 109954.[Link]1/21
Amorim, M. “The role of acoustic signals in fish reproduction.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154.5 (2023): 2959-2973.[Link]1/21
Vasconcelos, Raquel O., et al. “Characterization of the vocal behavior of the miniature and transparent fish model, Danionella cerebrum.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155.1 (2024): 781-789.[Link]1/21
Maruska, Karen P., Uyhun S. Ung, and Russell D. Fernald. “The African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni uses acoustic communication for reproduction: sound production, hearing, and behavioral significance.” PloS one 7.5 (2012): e37612.[Link]1/21
Ladich, Friedrich. “Ecology of sound communication in fishes.” Fish and fisheries 20.3 (2019): 552-563.[Link]1/21
Putland, Rosalyn L., John C. Montgomery, and Craig A. Radford. “Ecology of fish hearing.” Journal of Fish Biology 95.1 (2019): 39-52.[Link]1/21
Bass, Andrew H., and Friedrich Ladich. “Vocal–acoustic communication: From neurons to behavior.” Fish Bioacoustics: With 81 Illustrations. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2008. 253-278.[Link]1/21
De Jong, Karen, et al. “Noise affects multimodal communication during courtship in a marine fish.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6 (2018): 113.[Link]1/21
Cogliati, Karen M., Bryan D. Neff, and Sigal Balshine. “High degree of paternity loss in a species with alternative reproductive tactics.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67.3 (2013): 399-408.[Link]1/22
Mascolino, S., et al. “The ART of mating: alternative reproductive tactics and mating success in a nest‐guarding fish.” Journal of Fish Biology 89.6 (2016): 2643-2657.[Link]1/22
Bose, Aneesh PH, et al. “Brood‐tending males in a biparental fish suffer high paternity losses but rarely cuckold.” Molecular Ecology 27.21 (2018): 4309-4321.[Link]1/22
Zimmermann, Holger, et al. “Seasonal variation in cuckoldry rates in the socially monogamous cichlid fish Variabilichromis moorii.” Hydrobiologia 850.10 (2023): 2371-2383.[Link]1/22
Weir, Laura K. “Male–male competition and alternative male mating tactics influence female behavior and fertility in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67.2 (2013): 193-203.[Link]1/23
Koya, Yasunori, et al. “Two patterns of parasitic male mating behaviors and their reproductive success in Japanese medaka, Oryzias latipes.” Zoological science 30.2 (2013): 76-82.[Link]1/23
Mamun, M. S. A., et al. “Genetic diversity of medaka (Oryzias latipes) in paddy field water channels-a case study using microsatellite markers in Wanouchi Town, Gifu Prefecture.” 農業農村工学会論文集 83.3 (2015): I_99-I_106.[Link]1/23
Howard, Richard D., J. Andrew DeWoody, and William M. Muir. “Transgenic male mating advantage provides opportunity for Trojan gene effect in a fish.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101.9 (2004): 2934-2938.[Link]1/23
Grant, James WA, Michael J. Bryant, and Catherine E. Soos. “Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of female arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka.” Animal Behaviour 49.2 (1995): 367-375.[Link]1/23
Fujimoto, Shingo, et al. “Shorter Recruitment Periods and Higher Fecundity in High‐Latitude Populations of the Oryzias latipes Species Complex.” Population Ecology 68.1 (2026): e70012.[Link]1/24
Simmons, Leigh W. “Thirty Years of the Biology of Spermatozoa: The Rise and Future of an Evolutionary Paradigm.” Ecology and Evolution 16.1 (2026): e72985.[Link]1/27
Nobuo, Egami, Terao Osamu, and Iwao Yasuhiro. “The life span of wild populations of the fish Oryzias latipes under natural conditions.” Zoological science 5.5 (1988): 1149-1152.[Link]1/27
淡路雅彦, and 羽生功. “Studies on the reproductive rhythms of fishes. XIX Annual reproductive cycle of the wild type medaka.” 日本水産学会誌 53.6 (1987): 959-965.[Link]1/27
Awaji, M., and I. Hanyu. “Temperature-photoperiod conditions necessary to begin the spawning season in wild type medaka.” 日本水産学会誌 55.4 (1989): 747.[Link]1/27
Hemmer-Brepson, C., et al. “Non-stressful temperature effect on oxidative balance and life history traits in adult fish (Oryzias latipes).” Journal of Experimental Biology 217.2 (2014): 274-282.[Link]1/27
Awaji, Masahiko, and Isao Hanyu. “Seasonal changes in ovarian response to photoperiods in orange-red type medaka.” Zoological science 6.5 (1989): p943-950.[Link]1/27
West, Stuart A., et al. “Behavioural ecology in the twenty-first century.” Nature Ecology & Evolution (2025): 1-13.[Link]1/28
コメント